中文
← Back to directory

Model Evaluation

Open LLM Leaderboard

Open LLM Leaderboard is a Hugging Face Space published by the open-llm-leaderboard organization, described as an interactive leaderboard of open-source language models across tests such as IFEval, BBH, MATH, GPQA, MUSR and MMLU-PRO.

Official identity and purpose checked · 2026-10-26

Visit official site ↗
Plans
0
Official sources
1
Hands-on tests
0 not tested here
Data date
2026-10-26

Purpose

Open LLM Leaderboard is a Hugging Face Space published by the open-llm-leaderboard organization, described as an interactive leaderboard of open-source language models across tests such as IFEval, BBH, MATH, GPQA, MUSR and MMLU-PRO.

Features described on the official site

  • The page describes an interactive leaderboard of open-source language models.
  • Listed tests include IFEval, BBH, MATH, GPQA, MUSR and MMLU-PRO.
  • As a Hugging Face Space it also links files and community discussions.

Suggested starting workflow

  • Treat the leaderboard as a reference signal: read what each test measures and compare with your own task.
  • When you need a model, return to its model page to check license, size and runtime requirements.
  • Re-test with your own examples instead of choosing by rank alone.

These are editorial starting suggestions based on product purpose, not workflows tested by this site.

Before you use it

  • Only the page title and description were read; the body loads by script, so leaderboard data, update time and whether it is still updated were not read, and no scores or ranks are copied.
  • Leaderboard scores are not tested here and do not predict performance on a specific task; popularity counts such as likes are not cited.
  • Benchmark contamination, changes in methodology and the leaderboard's current status follow the official notes and are unverified.

Pricing & plans

Plan pricing has not been checked. Verify it with the provider; a starting price may not cover your task.

Official sources

Sources with the same saved document, review date and validity period are shown together. Expand to see the plans that cite each source. Plan conditions are checked separately; public sources do not establish hands-on task results.