中文
← Back to directory

Model Evaluation

MMBench

An OpenCompass Community multimodal-understanding benchmark using multiple-choice questions and fine-grained ability dimensions to analyze vision-language models, with Chinese and English data and evaluation-tool links.

Official identity and purpose checked · 2026-10-24

Visit official site ↗
Plans
0
Official sources
1
Hands-on tests
0 not tested here
Data date
2026-10-24

Purpose

An OpenCompass Community multimodal-understanding benchmark using multiple-choice questions and fine-grained ability dimensions to analyze vision-language models, with Chinese and English data and evaluation-tool links.

Features described on the official site

  • Ability dimensions cover visual perception and reasoning.
  • Describes Chinese and English Dev/Test splits, CCBench and data formats.
  • Explains CircularEval option rotation, answer extraction and VLMEvalKit.

Suggested starting workflow

  • Select the dataset and version for your language and task.
  • Match VLMEvalKit or legacy data formats and scoring protocols.
  • Distinguish single-pass and circular evaluation; record models, extractors and all settings.

These are editorial starting suggestions based on product purpose, not workflows tested by this site.

Before you use it

  • Not tested hands-on here; feature descriptions come from official material.
  • Pricing, regions, languages, commercial use, watermarks and export conditions have not been verified for a single plan.
  • Robustness, reproducibility and extraction-success claims are author descriptions, not reproduced here. Evaluation may use an external model to extract answers, with separate costs. Sample images are not copied, and historical tables are not current rankings.

Pricing & plans

Plan pricing has not been checked. Verify it with the provider; a starting price may not cover your task.

Official sources

Sources with the same saved document, review date and validity period are shown together. Expand to see the plans that cite each source. Plan conditions are checked separately; public sources do not establish hands-on task results.