GLM-5
GLM-5 targets complex systems engineering and long-horizon agentic tasks.
Verified
Core facts
Read by a script from the official API, not rewritten by a model.
- Repository
- https://github.com/zai-org/GLM-5
- License
- Apache-2.0
- Maintainer
- zai-org
- Homepage
- https://z.ai/blog/glm-5.3
- Verified
What it is
The project is launching GLM-5, which targets complex systems engineering and long-horizon agentic tasks. The project describes GLM-5.1 as its next-generation flagship model for agentic engineering. The project describes GLM-5.2 as its latest flagship model for long-horizon tasks. GLM-5.3 uses the same base model as GLM-5.2.
Main features
Compared to GLM-4.5, GLM-5 scales from 355B parameters (32B active) to 744B parameters (40B active), and increases pre-training data from 23T to 28.5T tokens.
GLM-5 also integrates DeepSeek Sparse Attention (DSA).
The project proposes IndexShare, which reuses the same indexer across every four sparse attention layers.
The project also improves the MTP layer of GLM-5.2 for speculative decoding.
The project says it developed slime, a novel asynchronous RL infrastructure.
GLM-5.3-Flash starts from a newly trained base model, with its architecture and training recipe redesigned around capability and efficiency.
Getting started
API services for GLM-5.3 and GLM-5.3-Flash are available on the Z.ai API Platform.
GLM-5.3 and GLM-5.3-Flash support controlling the thinking budget through the reasoning_effort parameter, which accepts three levels: low, high, and max.
GLM-5.2 accepts only high and max for reasoning_effort.
In the chat template for GLM-5.3 and GLM-5.3-Flash, clear_thinking defaults to false if not passed.
For deployment on the Ascend NPU platform, inference frameworks such as vLLM-Ascend, xLLM and SGLang are supported.
Who it is for
The GLM-5 series supports fine-tuning with Slime (v0.3.0+) and ms-swift (v4.4.0+). Slime (v0.3.0+) is the reinforcement learning framework used by the GLM team. ms-swift (v4.4.0+) supports SFT, PPO, and GRPO.
The project says GLM-5.1 is built to stay effective on agentic tasks over much longer horizons. The project reports that on standard coding benchmarks GLM-5.2 scores 81.0 vs. 62.0 for GLM-5.1 on Terminal-Bench 2.1 and 62.1 vs. 58.4 on SWE-bench Pro. The project says GLM-5 delivers significant improvement compared to GLM-4.7 across a wide range of academic benchmarks.
The project says that on its internal evaluation suite CC-Bench-V2, GLM-5 significantly outperforms GLM-4.7 across frontend, backend, and long-horizon tasks. Vending Bench 2 requires the model to run a simulated vending machine business over a one-year horizon. The project reports that on Vending Bench 2, GLM-5 finishes with a final account balance of $4,432.
The project says GLM-5.3 has a 50% improvement over GLM-5.2 on its in-house Z.ai Code Bench. The project says GLM-5.3 is state of the art on CyberGym for vulnerability discovery.
Sources
This page is written from the official sources below. Open them to check the original text.
- GitHub READMEhttps://github.com/zai-org/GLM-5Fetched
Verified ·
This page is written by AI from the official sources above and checked automatically. This site has not tested it. Found a mistake? Tell us.